Tuesday, March 13, 2012

The Road to Equality...

The road to equality is not something that can be undertaken by all, but is something which the population must evolve into.  Without a doubt, the concept that will be proposed throughout this narrative will be hard to digest for some, but others will find it so refreshing that adoption is quite likely.

The concept of equality is something imaginary in our current world as all men are subject to envies about others, usually based on religious or racially motivated factors.  For most of our history, one race has always tried to issue dominance over another.  In order to truly have a solid and lasting peace among men, we must all have an equal share of power in the world.  To accomplish such a lofty goal, we have to put aside the fierce need to show up the next man.  The resistance to such an idea will be the most difficult part to circumvent, but perhaps if enough people take it to heart, then perhaps it stands a small chance of changing the world as we know it.

Such a model has already been implemented in a company that for now will remain nameless due to the violent objections the community will likely have on how they conduct business.  Chief among their rules is the concept that every man deserves an equal share of the big pie, meaning equal pay for equal work.  This means that instead of having a huge workforce with a variable of work ethics, a system based upon the rule of equality must be enforced by sharing absolutely equal amounts of responsibility.  Absolutely equal pay, divided based on number of employees, and with no accounts for senority, skills, or education means that each person must adapt themselves to the needs of the group in order for the whole to survive.  Every person's responsibilities are suited to their strongest attributes, but they are asked, quite often, to do jobs that are not in their primary skill set, thus promoting enrichment of the individual through exposure to new ideas.  For a man/woman to deserve entry into the company, is is not the decision of a single "manager" to make the hiring decisions, but the entire workforce.

Instead of letting a single man determine the eligibility of a prospective employee, all men and women give their voice; thus, all members interview a candidate so a complete profile of their personality can be generated prior to employment.  This eliminates the need for drug testing and a background check.  If the consensus is that the person can be trusted and shows a deep desire to work as hard as the rest, then all workers will accept a pay cut to bring him/her on board as an equal.  As an equal member, the new employee also gains a voice that will be used to direct the company.

Without a board of executives or a single leader, no business could be considered to survive our current system; however, within this company, every man and woman has an equal voice in all major company decisions.  If a decision would usually fall on those at the top, such as a merger or acquisition, the entire workforce must give their views on it.  If all give the approval, then it goes forward; thus, if a single member objects, then it is the duty of all to help that person see the light, or vice versa.

If a single member of the staff begins neglecting their duties and the whole begins to falter as a result, then a vote must be taken among all.  If 75% of the workforce believes that it would be best to terminate said employee, then they are terminated, but are granted a small monthly sum until further work has been secured.

While this all sounds wonderful, one must ask, "How does this change the world for the better?"

The answer is simple.  By dividing up the payroll of a company equally, the majority must work that much harder in order to achieve a chance at having everything they desire.  It is not acceptable to let only a small number of employees take the largest share of the pie; instead, it is better to allow all to bask in the glory of equality.  With a much higher average pay throughout the ranks, there will be increased prosperity.  Having the means to enjoy life, rather than succumbing to the same old social diseases of poverty and jealousy, will equate to more spending overall; which, after local businesses begin to profit from our model, their increased spending will translate into greater profits for the equal paying company.  Thus, if the local business community begins to profit, their extra spending strengthens the bottom line of the company, meaning higher pay for all employees.

The quality of life is the greatest benefit of this model.  With ample resources, the common man can seek higher education, better healthcare, and have a much stronger chance at survival than one in a comparable position at a competing company.  While this possibly eliminates the chances of achieving a life comparable to those enjoying the excesses in the upper echelons of society, it does open up the idea that peace can only be achieved by believing in equality for all.  Education about this will translate into greater understanding and appreciation for what this could mean for all men.  If a number of companies adopted this model, then the profits would begin to increase in ways never before seen.  This does not have to stand in defiance of capitalism, as it can coexist peacefully with it.  Both entities are able to see success without one trying to issue dominance over the other.  The only thing this stands against is nature, as the strong always dominate the weak; thus, the comment of evolution was made, for mankind must evolve into this new mindset.

Of course, there will always be an element of society that will call for the damnation of any who believe in such a structure, but in time, even those who vocalize the strongest opinion against may see the benefits of adopting the concept of equality.

Society and Equality

If we wanted a future without war or distrust, a common goal of seeing without references to anything other than a man's personality must be achieved.  Meeting a new person should not be determined on whether the eyes are pleased by their outward appearance, but whether the mind can acclimate to their unique spin on the world.  Sure, some will always stand against seeing one group as an equal, as dominance over the weak works in all circles, none more evident than in foreign relations.  When my eyes are transfixed upon a new person, I appreciate every unique attribute that person has which contrasts with my own personal sense of style.  Instead of issuing a negative emotion based upon this appearance, I use logic to establish where they hail from, what type of background they must be used to, and use this to greet them in a manner best fitting the situation.

Over this lifetime, I have encountered countless persons that one group would immediately halt all relations with based upon a first glance, and with my view, have learned a great deal from everyone.  Without a doubt, the most can be learned from the person whom you contrast quite starkly against.  Whereas you may have lived to believe in one set of values, theirs can sometimes be of a completely alien nature, thus instead of promoting negativity, the adoption of curiosity will result in appreciation from both sides.  Conflict may be a natural part of life, but with an analytic mind that is set upon the absorption of information, one can put aside the natural need to dispel that which is different or misunderstood.

Dreaming for a future that is based on equality can be dangerous, but with faith in the ability of a man to understand the world of another, perhaps this view will result in a positive experience for everyone breathing the common air.